In order to be
able to draw conclusions with regard to the reliability of a component or
assembly, tests are conducted with a limited number of test samples prior to
actual series production. This is a relatively reliable method of discovering
fundamental design or manufacturing faults. On the other hand, the probability
of determining faults that occur randomly and at low frequency is low if a
considerably higher load cannot be applied in the test. This is generally the
case in vehicle tests, in contrast to the special component tests conducted on
component test rigs or in the laboratory, permitting an increase in load by a
factor of 2 and higher.
Nevertheless, with the following method, a
conclusion can still be drawn with regard to failure characteristics under
normal load conditions where no "failures" occur. The
prerequisite is that the number of test samples, that is always relatively low
for cost reasons, is subject to longer test periods than is necessary in normal
use.
If no failures occur in the test, using formula
![]()
The reliability R of the component can be
determined with a statement probability of, generally, PA = 0.80.
n is the number
of tests and Lvr the relative service life ratio. This represents the test time
in relation to the required service life. b is the form factor at
b = 2 or b = 3.5 (see rise of Weibull straight line).
An example: The number of components to be
tested is to be found if a double test time compared to the required service
life is possible and a minimum reliability of R = 80 % is
required. No parts fail in the test. This results in n = 3 for a
statement probability of PA = 0.80.

If a defined minimum reliability is stipulated
and the requirement is what statement probability is achieved, the
above-specified formula is to be correspondingly rearranged to result in
b = 2 and R = 80 %.
It can generally be said that, for the
statement probability or for determining the reliability, it is better to test
less "samples" for longer than many samples for a relatively short
testing time. On the other hand, however, with less samples the conclusion
concerning the component scatter is also less reliable.
In any case, Lvr must be greater than 1.
The template LvRb20.vxg and LvRb35.vxg can be
used for this approach.
If a conclusion is required with regard to the
reduction in service life due to higher load, tests with concrete failures will
be necessary, represented in a stress-cycle (Woehler) diagram.